Building A Mystery

2009 January 23
by Evangeline Holland

Going indie is fraught with difficulties, triumph and fear. Since making the decision to publish my own works, I’ve vacillated between telling myself I’m crazy and sneaking pleading looks at NY, and setting my face to the wind, sure of my step. Outside of the logistics of self-publishing, I’ve come to realize the most difficult issue a would-be indie author has to face is to stop looking at their career from the viewpoint of your NY-published peer.

When you make the decision to write, package, market and sell your own fiction or non-fiction, you’re building your career from scratch. You don’t have an editorial board, or a marketing department, or an art director, or press agents, or booksellers holding a piece of the publishing process. You don’t have the option of placing your complete trust in the odds of your success in the hands of others. In a way, when your book tanks, you have a convenient scapegoat: my cover was horrible! my print run was too low! Wal-Mart refused to carry my book! etc etc. Because you don’t have that buffer, or that “support,” an indie author cannot afford to base their career or goals on that of the basic NY model.

The indie author must be completely autonomous–essentially, independent. I can even say that what is good for one indie author is not necessarily good for another. For one thing, you’re operating outside of the flow and ebb of being a writer and existing within the publishing industry. NY can be seen as a public high school, where everyone streams into one door, through one path, and where everyone goes to classes they have no choice to take. Though each student has their own strengths and weaknesses, their own tragedies and pains, but the playing field is level. There is a bigger chance of middle-of-the-road success. Compare this to the home-schooler, who does have a required list of classes to take, but they have the freedom to build upon their home education with activities, or field trips, and the like, to supplement their learning, and in the process learn whether they possess the aptitude for independent study. I’m not advocating home-schooling vs public schooling, but the analogy seems fitting.

In the process of being an independent publisher, one explores and expands the concept of being a writer, of what it means to control your art. And, while you test and try different things as a writer, you can do the same as a publisher. As an indie, a failure isn’t the result of some unfathomable puzzle, and success isn’t because you’ve hit the right buttons for the marketing department. Ultimately, when you make the decision to control your writing, you’ve essentially said, to quote our new president, “Yes We Can.”.

6 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 January 23

    What attracts me to self-publishing is the complete creative control that I have over my work. But as you suggest, with total freedom comes total responsibility. If my novel is great, then I can take all of the credit. But if my novel sucks, then I have only myself to blame.

    And to support your home-schooling analogy, I’ve found that home-schooled students tend to be among my better students (more focused, less apt to cause trouble, more likely to participate, more likely to sit in the front row of desks) and they tend to be among the best writers in the class.

  2. 2009 January 23

    I look at the challenges you talk about as one of the greatest thrills of being an indie author. I love the challenge.

  3. 2009 January 23
    robinaltman permalink

    It seems at though the NY publishing firms don’t do much in the way of marketing new authors. Therefore, writers need to do much of the networking and market building themselves, whether they go indie or stick with a more traditional route. The things we learn along the way will help all authors.

  4. 2009 January 24

    Hey Evangeline, great first post! Welcome to the blog!

    I think for me what it came down to was… I am willing to lose the game, but I’m not willing to stand in line just to get permission to play at all. I’m not willing to lose before I play.

    And since the vast majority of writers never find a publisher (It’s just common sense numbers) then many people have their writing dreams shot down before they even exit the gate.

    I read about a guy who it took him 50 years to get a contract. What if he’d died the year before that? And 50 years…that’s a long damn time.

    I’m not willing to play those odds. But I will lay odds on myself and my own work actually OUT in the marketplace. I’ll make mistakes and I’ll learn from them or I won’t, but I get to play the game. And that’s the most important thing to me.

  5. 2009 January 25

    Great post, E! (I say that as both an indie writer and a homeschooling mom. ;) )

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. A Different Review for This Week « Publishing Renaissance

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.